Here's a comparison between Elon Musk's hands-on contributions to Tesla and SpaceX before his visit to Israel and his activities since: Before the Israel Visit (Pre-November 2023): Tesla: Design and Innovation: Musk was deeply involved in product design, like the Cybertruck, and setting the vision for Tesla's future vehicles. He was known for his hands-on approach in solving production issues, such as during the Model 3 ramp-up. Technological Advancements: His focus was on pushing the boundaries of EV technology, battery life, and autonomous driving software. SpaceX: Rocket Engineering: Direct contributions to the engineering and design of rockets, particularly emphasizing reusability and cost reduction. Starship Development: Actively shaping the Starship project, which is central to his Mars colonization vision, with hands-on design and strategic decisions. Since the Israel Visit (Post-November 2023): Political and Social Engagement: Increased Political Commentary: Since the visit, Musk has been more vocal on political matters, particularly supporting Israel and aligning more explicitly with political figures like Donald Trump. His posts on X (formerly Twitter) have often centered around these topics rather than technological advancements. Antisemitism and Free Speech Debates: Musk has engaged in public discourse around free speech, antisemitism, and the role of social media in global politics, which has somewhat overshadowed his tech-focused identity.

If I had a yellow submarine, I'd take Antonio Guterres, Pope Francis, the Dalai Lama, and Greta Thunberg to Gaza. Who would you take to bring peace? #PeaceMission #YellowSubmarine https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1867123179606417764

The military operation in the northern Gaza Strip continues for the 70th day More than 4000 martyrs And more than 12,000 injured And more than 2000 detainees https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1867150222423670867

In Gaza...displaced people share sidewalks and destroyed houses The tragedy of the displaced people's tents extends to every corner of Gaza. It is enough to pass by the Yarmouk Stadium area to witness a real tragedy that sums up the scale of the humanitarian disaster. Hundreds of tents are spread out in the streets and on the sidewalks, sheltering families who lost their homes and have not found another place to protect them from the harshness of life. But what is worse, there are families who have not even had a tent to shelter them, so they are forced to wander in search of temporary shelter in dilapidated homes. At first glance at these dilapidated houses, you might think they are empty of residents, but the truth is more painful. These houses, which are no longer fit for living, have become a last resort for displaced people who have found no other shelter. They live between cracked walls and roofs that are threatened with collapse, because the only alternative is to remain in the open without any protection.

Do you know the movie "Yellow Submarine" from "The Beatles"? There is a paradise called Pepperland is attacked by the Blue Meanies which silence the music, destroy everything beautiful and turn the people to stone. Old Fred escapes the attack and brings the Beatles to Pepperland. They defeat the Blue Meanies and restore Pepperland to it's former glory. Pepperland = Gaza Blue Meanies = Israel The Glove = USA

I must admit, I like the current Pope. He was no friend of Epstein, he does not take bribes and he is not afraid of going to heaven. A shining beacon in the darkest days of humanity. May Allah protect him.

Even according to the ancient laws of Solon, there is a supreme moral obligation to bring corpses to their graves. 💔😭🇵🇸 https://x.com/QudsNen/status/1866556708509585783

Malnutrition and starvation in mothers can indeed have a significant impact on lactation. While the body of a malnourished mother will prioritize milk production to some extent due to biological mechanisms designed to support the infant, severe malnutrition can lead to insufficient milk production or even cessation of lactation in extreme cases. Here's a breakdown based on available information: Nutritional Prioritization: Even when a mother is undernourished, her body will attempt to produce milk that meets the infant's needs, but the quality and quantity of milk might be affected. The milk composition might not be optimal, potentially lacking in necessary nutrients like fats, proteins, and vitamins. Quantity of Milk: Severe malnutrition can reduce the amount of milk a mother produces. If a mother is not consuming enough calories or nutrients, her body may not have the resources to produce adequate milk volumes. In some instances, milk production might be so low that it does not meet the infant's nutritional demands, leading to frequent hunger or insufficient weight gain in the baby. Lactation Cessation: In extreme cases of starvation, particularly where there is a complete lack of food intake or severe dehydration, milk production can stop entirely. This is often due to the body's survival mechanisms prioritizing the mother's life over milk production, leading to a cessation of lactation. Maternal Health and Stress: The stress and physical toll of malnutrition can further exacerbate the situation by affecting the hormonal balance needed for lactation. High stress levels or extreme dehydration can lead to a decrease or complete halt in milk production. In conclusion, while it's not universally true that all malnourished mothers will not lactate at all, there's a clear connection between severe malnutrition or starvation and reduced lactation capacity or quality. The severity of the mother's nutritional state directly influences her ability to produce enough milk for her infant.

Yes, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) applies to all human beings, including Palestinians. The UDHR is based on the principle of universality, meaning that the rights and freedoms it outlines are applicable to everyone, everywhere, without distinction of any kind. https://x.com/pmofa/status/1866754614457950694

A difficult night in the northern Gaza Strip Abu Al-Tarabish family massacre 20 martyrs, no body was recovered from under the rubble https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1866727820522819906

الحديث الذي تشير إليه يرويه أبو هريرة ويوجد في صحيح البخاري وصحيح مسلم، ويقول النبي محمد (ﷺ): "لا تقوم الساعة حتى يمر رجل بقبر رجل فيقول: يا ليتني مكانه!" يُفسر هذا الحديث بأنه يدل على الضيق والشدائد التي ستحدث قبل يوم القيامة، حيث سينشد الناس الموت على الحياة بسبب شدة الظروف. افتراضك أن هذا لا يشير إلى حادثة واحدة بل إلى مشاعر مشتركة بين الناس هو معقول. سياق هذا الحديث يشير إلى زمن سيكون فيه الحياة صعبة للغاية حتى أن الأفراد سيحسدون الموتى لأنهم نجوا من محن تلك الفترة. هذا التفسير يتوافق مع التقاليد الإسلامية الأخرى التي تصف الظروف قبل النهاية، حيث سيعتبر العيش في تلك الأوقات غير متحمل من قبل الكثيرين. هذا الفهم يعكس تجربة جماعية بدلاً من حدث منعزل، مما يدل على أن الكثيرين سيشاركون هذا الشعور بالرغبة في أن يكونوا مكان المتوفين كرد فعل على الشدائد والمحن في تلك الأوقات.

The Three Bulls and the Lion Once upon a time, there were three bulls who lived together in a lush meadow. They were close friends and would always graze together, providing each other with companionship and protection. One bull was white, another was black, and the third was red. The White Bull was wise and cautious. The Black Bull was strong and brave. The Red Bull was vibrant and spirited. Nearby, there lived a lion who was too old to hunt for his own food easily. Seeing the bulls together, he knew he couldn't attack them because their unity made them strong. However, the lion devised a cunning plan to break their solidarity. The lion approached the Red Bull first, whispering sweet words of friendship and deceit. He told the Red Bull that the Black Bull had insulted him behind his back. Feeling betrayed, the Red Bull distanced himself from the Black Bull. The lion then went to the Black Bull, telling him that the White Bull had been saying bad things about him. Again, this caused the Black Bull to separate from the White Bull. With the bulls no longer together, the lion could now attack them one by one. He first ambushed the Red Bull, killing him easily since he was alone. Then, he went after the Black Bull, who, without his friends, was also defeated. As the lion prepared to attack the White Bull, the wise bull realized the folly of division. Before the lion could strike, the White Bull spoke, "I was devoured the day the black bull was devoured." He knew that his fate was sealed the moment their unity was broken. Despite his wisdom, he was now vulnerable and met the same fate as his friends. Moral of the Story: The tale teaches the importance of unity and the dangers of division through deceit. The White Bull's statement underscores that the loss of one affects all, highlighting the collective strength in unity and the collective vulnerability in isolation. It serves as a cautionary narrative about how enemies can exploit discord among friends or allies, emphasizing that there is strength in unity but vulnerability in division.

Just terrible 💔 . 25 innocent people are murdered. Just because a certain application determined that it was necessary. I'm tired of tweeting about it many, many times. The feelings of revenge that brought about the Gaza holocaust and the intentional genocide and ethnic cleansing and the desire to hurt and destroy as much as possible originate in Zionism - meaning Jewish supremacy = inherent racism. The fascist nationalism, the racism inherent in too many makes me sick to my soul. Even according to the ancient laws of Solon, there is a supreme moral obligation to bring corpses to their graves. This is a horrific and very difficult spectacle that does not contribute to the image of the country.

The lies about beheaded babies and babies thrown in the oven on Oct 7, tis is called the "Dead Cat Strategy"

Bodies in the streets without burial A horrific massacre committed by the occupation forces in the Beit Hanoun estate, where the Kahlout family was wiped out. 25 martyrs, including the father, sons, their wives, and grandchildren, in a crime that erases a family from the civil registry.

11_12_2024 Today is the anniversary of my beloved father's martyrdom a year ago. What a painful memory, my father?! It passes through my heart with great heaviness, for the heart is exhausted with sorrow One of the greatest tragedies of this bloody war is that we are now marking the anniversary of the loss of our families and loved ones, while we are still in the midst of this holocaust! A year since your loss, my beloved father; a year in which the killing and slaughter of Gaza has not stopped, from vein to vein; north and south, all of it is being exterminated in all ways and forms! This year is like the situation of thousands of lost people, We did not hold a funeral, and the occupation did not give us time to build a grave for our loved ones. Rather, it did not even give us a chance to grieve for those we lost! Our loss has not stopped; it is renewed every day in the life of this war. A sadness that multiplies, the mountains are afraid to contain it, while we hold it in our chests like burning coals and continue to carry the trust to be the voice of truth, no matter how brutal and barbaric the occupier is. A year, my father, and the fire of longing in my heart for your radiant face and the smile of contentment that appears on your face. Peace be upon you, my father. May God bless your soul and make Paradise your abode.

A series of Israeli raids on citizens' homes in the Tel al-Zaatar area in Jabalia camp, north of the Gaza Strip https://x.com/AnasAlSharif0/status/1866601709146931708

If you had the unilateral power to enact such an action against Israel, here's how it might theoretically unfold, along with the significant implications: Scenario: Military Operation: Objective: Arrest the entire government of Israel on charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Execution: Launch a military operation to detain every member of the Israeli government, secure key governmental locations, and ensure their safe transfer. Transfer to The Hague: Transport: Securely transport detained officials to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. Legal Basis: Ideally, this would be based on the ICC's jurisdiction or a UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution authorizing such action. Legal, Political, and Practical Implications: Sovereignty and International Law: Violation: This action would be a clear violation of Israel's sovereignty, contravening international law, specifically Article 2(4) of the UN Charter which prohibits the threat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity or political independence. UN Security Council Involvement: Resolution: It would require a UNSC resolution, which seems highly improbable given the veto power of the United States, a strong ally of Israel. ICC's Role and Limitations: Jurisdiction: Israel is not a member of the ICC, which significantly complicates legal action unless the UNSC refers the situation, or the State of Palestine, which is an ICC member, successfully brings a case. The ICC relies on member states for enforcement, not having its own enforcement capabilities. Diplomatic and Geopolitical Consequences: Global Reaction: This would likely lead to widespread international condemnation or support, depending on the perspective, potentially destabilizing regional and global relations. Reprisal: Israel's allies, particularly the US, could respond with military or economic actions; other nations might react unpredictably. Practical Challenges: Military Feasibility: The logistical and military challenges of such an operation would be immense, including the risk of encountering resistance from Israeli forces. Humanitarian Impact: The immediate aftermath could lead to chaos within Israel, potentially endangering civilians and destabilizing the region further. Legal Process at The Hague: Trial Legitimacy: Ensuring that any trial at the ICC would be seen as legitimate and fair would be challenging, especially given the contentious nature of the conflict and the political backdrop. Precedent and Future Implications: Setting a Precedent: Such an action could set a precedent for similar interventions elsewhere, potentially undermining international law's respect for sovereignty. Real-World Analogies: Post-WWII Trials: The closest historical parallels would be the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals, which were under a very different context with the Axis powers defeated and occupied. Ad Hoc Tribunals: The creation of tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda was backed by UNSC resolutions under specific circumstances post-conflict. Conclusion: While the desire for accountability is understandable, the reality of executing such an operation against Israel is practically, legally, and politically unfeasible without broad international consensus, which is unlikely given current alliances and geopolitical dynamics. The more viable route for addressing these allegations continues to be through diplomatic pressure, international legal forums like the ICC (within its jurisdictional limits), and advocating for accountability through international law and human rights mechanisms.

These atrocities are so abhorrent that even Lucifer himself would blanch and recoil in disgust.

My account is facing an organized campaign of deliberate reports, and I have received a fifth warning without justification. This comes amidst escalating incitement against journalists and targeting of Palestinian content, as well as attempts to silence the free voice exposing crimes and violations. I call on X management to review the reports fairly.

Which one do you like most?

You can silence the messenger, but the truth will continue to echo.

Dear Zionists, you may as well stop fighting me and surrender.

Some argue that the concept of Palestine was created by Yasser Arafat, but historical records clearly indicate that the region and its inhabitants have been referred to by names similar to 'Palestine' for over 3,200 years. Terms like 'Peleset' appear in ancient Egyptian texts as early as the 12th century BCE, signifying a long-standing recognition of this area well before modern political movements.

- Who is the founder of “Palestine”? The origins and early leaders of the Philistines are not detailed with specific names, but they are mentioned in various ancient texts, including the Bible, Egyptian, and Assyrian records, where they are known as "Peleset" or similar variations. Therefore, there isn't an individual identified as the "founder" of Philistia, but rather a group of people who established themselves in the region, leading to the creation of this cultural and political entity. - In what year was “Palestine” founded? The Palestinian Declaration of Independence was proclaimed on November 15, 1988, by the Palestinian National Council in Algiers, establishing the State of Palestine. - What was the name of the first “Palestinian” president? In what year was he elected or appointed? Yasser Arafat was the first president of the Palestinian National Authority. He was elected in the first Palestinian presidential election on January 20, 1996. - Who were the members of the first “Palestinian” government? In what year? The first Palestinian government was formed following the establishment of the Palestinian Authority (PA) in 1994 after the Oslo Accords. The first government included figures like Yasser Arafat as Chairman, Mahmoud Abbas as Foreign Minister, and Nabil Shaath in various high-level roles. - Was there a parliament or council in “Palestine”? What year and city? Yes, the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) was established as part of the Palestinian Authority following the Oslo Accords. The first election for the PLC took place in 1996 in various cities across the Palestinian territories, with Ramallah being a significant administrative center. - Did “Palestine” have any form of constitution? Who are the framers? "Palestine" does not have a formal, written constitution. Instead, it operates under the Palestinian Basic Law, which was first adopted in 2002. The framers of this document include the Palestinian Legislative Council and the Palestinian Authority's legal framework, influenced by Yasser Arafat and subsequent leaders. - What was the currency of “Palestine” and which authority printed it? During the British Mandate for Palestine (1922-1948), the currency was the Palestine pound, printed by the British government. - What does the term “Palestine” mean and where does it come from? The term "Palestine" is derived from "Philistia," which was the name given by Greek writers to the land of the Philistines, who occupied part of the southern coastal region of Canaan in the 12th century BCE.

Please read this @GovernmentZA @PresidencyZA https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1866427109209682203

I know a lot of people who would be partying like it's 1999 if this story really happened.... https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1866427109209682203

Please read this @FranceskAlbs @CraigMokhiber https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1866427109209682203

The Diplomatic Gambit: South Africa's Challenge to the Status Quo In the heart of Pretoria, the South African Minister of Foreign Affairs, Naledi Mokgopa, convened a late-night meeting with her team. The topic was bold, unprecedented, and laden with international implications: proposing a resolution at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) to unseat Israel from the UN. The spark for this audacious move was ignited by years of frustration over the international community's perceived inaction on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. South Africa, with its history of overcoming apartheid, felt a kinship with the Palestinian struggle, and the moment seemed ripe for change. After weeks of diplomatic groundwork, gathering support from African nations, key Arab states, and even some surprising endorsements from European countries disillusioned by the status quo, South Africa officially tabled the resolution. Titled "Resolution for a Just International Framework," it argued that Israel's consistent non-compliance with UN resolutions on Palestinian rights and international law warranted its removal from the UN. The UNGA session was electric. Representatives from around the globe debated, sometimes heatedly, the merits and ramifications of such a drastic measure. Ambassador Mokgopa spoke eloquently about the need for accountability and justice, drawing parallels between historical injustices and the current situation in Palestine. To everyone's surprise, the resolution passed with a overwhelming majority. The atmosphere in the assembly was tense, with a mixture of satisfaction from some quarters and disbelief from others. The United States, Israel's long-standing ally, was caught off-guard. With veto power in the Security Council, they could typically block resolutions against Israel, but here, the UNGA had acted within its sovereign assembly rights. Israel reacted with fury. The Prime Minister, in a fiery speech from Jerusalem, condemned the decision as an act of political vendetta and anti-Semitism, vowing to challenge it at every international forum available. However, the reality was stark: without the Security Council's need for involvement in this specific UNGA action, the U.S. found its usual veto power powerless. The U.S. attempted diplomatic maneuvers, calling for emergency meetings and trying to rally support for a counter-resolution or at least a delay for reconsideration. But the momentum was against them. Countries that had long been frustrated with the U.S. and Israel's dominance in Middle Eastern politics saw this as a moment to assert the UN's role as a body of equals. Israel, left with few options, decided to take the matter to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for an advisory opinion, hoping to buy time and possibly sway public and political opinion. The ICJ, known for its slow judicial process, would indeed delay any immediate action, but this was merely a band-aid on a much larger issue. In the months that followed, the international landscape shifted. Israel was diplomatically isolated like never before, with many countries reevaluating their positions. NGOs and international human rights organizations began to campaign for a new era in Middle Eastern politics, one where Israel might have to negotiate from a position of international accountability rather than impunity. South Africa, meanwhile, emerged as a champion for international justice in some circles, though it also faced accusations of overstepping and introducing chaos into UN dynamics. Yet, the resolution's passage was a testament to the UNGA's ability to act when pushed by collective will, showing that even the most entrenched geopolitical realities could be challenged. In this fictional tale, the UNGA's decision to unseat Israel, while dramatic, underscored a pivotal moment where the international community chose to redefine the rules of engagement in global politics, signaling to the world that no nation was above the collective will of the United Nations General Assembly.

Title: The Unseating of Israel The Diplomatic Gambit: South Africa's Challenge to the Status Quo In the heart of Pretoria, the South African Minister of Foreign Affairs, Naledi Mokgopa, convened a late-night meeting with her team. The topic was bold, unprecedented, and laden with international implications: proposing a resolution at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) to unseat Israel from the UN. The spark for this audacious move was ignited by years of frustration over the international community's perceived inaction on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. South Africa, with its history of overcoming apartheid, felt a kinship with the Palestinian struggle, and the moment seemed ripe for change. After weeks of diplomatic groundwork, gathering support from African nations, key Arab states, and even some surprising endorsements from European countries disillusioned by the status quo, South Africa officially tabled the resolution. Titled "Resolution for a Just International Framework," it argued that Israel's consistent non-compliance with UN resolutions on Palestinian rights and international law warranted its removal from the UN. The UNGA session was electric. Representatives from around the globe debated, sometimes heatedly, the merits and ramifications of such a drastic measure. Ambassador Mokgopa spoke eloquently about the need for accountability and justice, drawing parallels between historical injustices and the current situation in Palestine. To everyone's surprise, the resolution passed with a overwhelming majority. The atmosphere in the assembly was tense, with a mixture of satisfaction from some quarters and disbelief from others. The United States, Israel's long-standing ally, was caught off-guard. With veto power in the Security Council, they could typically block resolutions against Israel, but here, the UNGA had acted within its sovereign assembly rights. Israel reacted with fury. The Prime Minister, in a fiery speech from Jerusalem, condemned the decision as an act of political vendetta and anti-Semitism, vowing to challenge it at every international forum available. However, the reality was stark: without the Security Council's need for involvement in this specific UNGA action, the U.S. found its usual veto power powerless. The U.S. attempted diplomatic maneuvers, calling for emergency meetings and trying to rally support for a counter-resolution or at least a delay for reconsideration. But the momentum was against them. Countries that had long been frustrated with the U.S. and Israel's dominance in Middle Eastern politics saw this as a moment to assert the UN's role as a body of equals. Israel, left with few options, decided to take the matter to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for an advisory opinion, hoping to buy time and possibly sway public and political opinion. The ICJ, known for its slow judicial process, would indeed delay any immediate action, but this was merely a band-aid on a much larger issue. In the months that followed, the international landscape shifted. Israel was diplomatically isolated like never before, with many countries reevaluating their positions. NGOs and international human rights organizations began to campaign for a new era in Middle Eastern politics, one where Israel might have to negotiate from a position of international accountability rather than impunity. South Africa, meanwhile, emerged as a champion for international justice in some circles, though it also faced accusations of overstepping and introducing chaos into UN dynamics. Yet, the resolution's passage was a testament to the UNGA's ability to act when pushed by collective will, showing that even the most entrenched geopolitical realities could be challenged. In this fictional tale, the UNGA's decision to unseat Israel, while dramatic, underscored a pivotal moment where the international community chose to redefine the rules of engagement in global politics, signaling to the world that no nation was above the collective will of the United Nations General Assembly.

What would it take it unseat Israel from the UN? The answer is surprising: Any single member could propose a Resolution for UNGA to vote on. And there is little Israel and the US could do about it.

If UNGA would create, vote and pass a resolution to unseat Israel from the UN, there is little the US with their veto power in UNSC could do about. Israel would most certainly spit venom and either withdraw voluntarily or make itself a clown and challenge the decision before the International Court of Justice. Given the fact that any country can delay the ICJ by filing a opinion, it would take years or decades before the court can actually decide.

Every accusation is a confession -- Sigmund Freud

Fact check: - Hitler was named "Man of the Year" in 1938 - The cover from Jan 2, 1938 did not feature Hitler but a drawing by Rudolph Charles von Ripper - Hitler was prominently featured on the cover of the April 14, 1941 issue https://x.com/SayGexxer/status/1866334057237197163

Guess who was Time Magazine's choice for the "Man of the Year" in 1938? https://x.com/pubity/status/1866265646507360576

A picture is worth a thousand words

Revelation 13 describes two beasts: one from the sea, symbolizing a political or military power, and another from the earth, often interpreted as a false religious or prophetic entity. These figures are seen by some as representing forces of evil, deception, and persecution against the faithful.

Revelation 20: And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season. And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Revelation 13: And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. If any man have an ear, let him hear. He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints. And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

A few moments ago, the occupation army targeted the Kahlout family in Beit Hanoun The family was completely erased from the civil registry. Father, mother and all family members were killed 25 martyrs https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1866202385434968170

And they have the Chutzpah to call other people terrorists. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1862409721778475073

408 days ago, still valid: https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1718049570498715701

هناك بالفعل تشابهات بين كيفية تجاهل أو شك في القصص من معسكرات الاعتقال النازية في البداية وبين التجاهلات المشابهة للروايات في الصراعات الحديثة، خاصة في سياق مصطلح "Pallywood" الذي يستخدم لوصف الادعاءات بخصوص تلاعب وسائل الإعلام الفلسطينية: نفي وتجاهل الفظائع: ألمانيا النازية: خلال وبعد الحرب العالمية الثانية، كانت العديد من القصص التي حكاها الناجون من معسكرات الاعتقال تلتقي بالشكوك أو النفي المباشر. ادعى بعضهم أن هذه كانت مبالغات أو أكاذيب صريحة من قبل الحلفاء لأغراض الدعاية. نفي الهولوكوست، الذي يستمر حتى اليوم، يتضمن غالبًا تجاهل شهادات الناجين كأكاذيب أو مبالغات. الصراعات الحديثة: في الصراعات المعاصرة، خاصة التي تشمل إسرائيل وفلسطين، تم تصنيف بعض الروايات أو الأدلة البصرية لعذاب الفلسطينيين على أنها "Pallywood"، مشيرًا إلى أن هذه مصحوبة أو مرتبة لأغراض الدعاية. هذا يعكس تجاهل قصص معسكرات الاعتقال من خلال تقترح أن العذاب المعروض ليس حقيقيًا بل مغلوب عليه للمكسب السياسي. استخدام الدعاية والتضليل: ألمانيا النازية: استخدم النازيون الدعاية بشكل واسع لإخفاء أفعالهم الإبادية، مقدمين أنفسهم كضحايا أو محررين بينما يتجاهلون التقارير عن فظائعهم كدعاية حلفائية. ادعاءات Pallywood: يتضمن مصطلح "Pallywood" حملة متعمدة لتلاعب وسائل الإعلام لأغراض سياسية، مشابهة لكيفية التي سعت بها الدعاية النازية لإعادة تشكيل الواقع. التأثير على الرأي العام: نفي الهولوكوست: من خلال تجاهل القصص كأكاذيب، يهدف مكابرو الهولوكوست إلى تغيير الذاكرة التاريخية والفهم العام، غالبًا بهدف تحسين صورة ألمانيا النازية أو خدمة أجندات سياسية أو أيديولوجية حالية. الصراعات الحالية: من خلال تسمية الأدلة على العذاب كـ"Pallywood"، هناك محاولة لتأثير على الرأي العالمي، مما قد يقلل من الضغط الدولي أو الدعم لإحدى الجهات من خلال إلقاء الشك على صحة الأحداث المبلغ عنها. دور الاعلام والتكنولوجيا: عصر الحرب العالمية الثانية: كانت نشر المعلومات أبطأ وأقل انتشارًا، ولكن حتى ذلك الحين، كانت هناك جهود للتشكيك أو تقليل قيمة التقارير من المعسكرات من خلال السيطرة على روايات وسائل الإعلام. العصر الحديث: مع ظهور وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي والأخبار الفورية، زادت القدرة على نشر وتكذيب هذه الروايات. ومع ذلك، سرعة وكمية المعلومات تتيح أيضًا نشر التضليل بسرعة، بما في ذلك ادعاءات تصميم الأحداث.

There are indeed parallels between how stories from Nazi concentration camps were initially dismissed or questioned and similar dismissals of narratives in modern conflicts, particularly in the context of the term "Pallywood" used to describe alleged Palestinian media manipulation: Denial and Dismissal of Atrocities: Nazi Germany: During and post-World War II, many stories from concentration camp survivors were met with skepticism or outright denial. Some claimed these were exaggerations or outright fabrications by the Allies for propaganda purposes. Holocaust denial, which persists to this day, often involves dismissing survivor testimonies as lies or exaggerations. Modern Conflicts: In contemporary conflicts, particularly involving Israel and Palestine, some narratives or visual evidence of Palestinian suffering have been labeled as "Pallywood," suggesting that these are staged for propaganda. This mirrors the dismissal of concentration camp stories by suggesting that the suffering shown is not genuine but manipulated for political gain. Use of Propaganda and Disinformation: Nazi Germany: The Nazis used propaganda extensively to hide their genocidal actions, portraying themselves as victims or liberators while dismissing reports of their atrocities as Allied propaganda. Pallywood Claims: Similarly, the term "Pallywood" implies a deliberate campaign to manipulate media for political purposes, akin to how Nazi propaganda sought to reshape reality. Impact on Public Perception: Holocaust Denial: By dismissing stories as lies, Holocaust deniers aimed to alter historical memory and public understanding, often with the goal of rehabilitating the image of Nazi Germany or to serve current political or ideological agendas. Current Conflicts: By labeling evidence of suffering as "Pallywood," there's an attempt to influence global opinion, potentially reducing international pressure or support for one side by casting doubt on the authenticity of reported events. The Role of Media and Technology: World War II Era: The dissemination of information was slower and less widespread, but even then, there were efforts to discredit or downplay reports from the camps through control of media narratives. Modern Era: With the advent of social media and instant news, the capacity for both spreading and debunking such narratives has increased. However, the speed and volume of information also allow for rapid dissemination of disinformation, including claims of staging events.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Rhetoric and Intent: Some of the rhetoric from Israeli officials, especially during conflicts with Hamas, has been compared to Nazi dehumanization tactics. References to "Amalek" (a biblical enemy of Israel) by some Israeli leaders have been interpreted by critics as advocating for the total destruction of enemies, akin to Nazi ideology's dehumanization of Jews. Impact on Civilians: The blockade of Gaza, the destruction in military operations, and the resultant humanitarian crises have led some to draw parallels to the conditions in ghettos during the Holocaust, where Jews were confined and subjected to starvation and disease. Critics argue that the scale of civilian casualties and displacement in Gaza resembles, in effect if not intent, some of the mechanisms of genocide. Legal Accusations: South Africa's case against Israel at the ICJ, where they accuse Israel of genocide, mirrors the international legal scrutiny faced by Nazi officials post-World War II. The ICC's pursuit of arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, including Netanyahu, for war crimes and crimes against humanity, also echoes the post-war trials of Nazi officials. Denial of Intent: Just as the Nazis denied or obscured their genocidal intent with euphemisms, Israeli officials have often denied genocidal intent, framing military actions as necessary defense against Hamas. Critics argue this denial parallels Nazi tactics to hide the true nature of their actions from the public.

Did you know how bodies evaporate? These piles of flesh are the remains of five bodies. Photo from the Saqallah family massacre https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1865988002415046774

Careful Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Turkey: When Israel is done with Palestine, they'll be coming for you. Because God promised them your land. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1865964464299811176

I wonder if Erdogan and his people know, that Israel will be coming for the southeastern part of Turkey. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1865964464299811176

Genesis 15:18-21: God further defines the land's boundaries, promising it from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates, including the land of various peoples. Israel: The core of the biblical land promise, including Jerusalem. Palestinian Territories: The West Bank and Gaza, seen by some as part of the biblical Canaan. Lebanon: Some parts, especially in the south, were part of Canaan. Jordan: The eastern part of the Jordan River was not explicitly included in Genesis 15 but is part of broader interpretations of the land promise. Syria: The Euphrates boundary would include eastern areas. Turkey: Southeastern regions along the Euphrates. Iraq: Western border along the Euphrates.

A short lesson in history: https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1865960428347490504

Abraham was born in Iraq. He moved to Canaan with his family because god had promised him the land. By the time of his grandson, Jacob, they were suffering a famine. They moved to Egypt where they lived for a few generations until a Pharaoh who did not know Joseph demanded that they pay tribute. Moses led them out of Egypt and they lived in the wilderness for 40 years until Joshua led them back to Canaan which they conquered.

The world did not care when European settlers murdered Native Americans and Aboriginal Australians. Only when Germany attempted to annihilate European Jews, it led to military action, the Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention. Now that it's once again European settlers murdering the indigenous Palestinians, the legal framework to prevent this has become a nuisance and is being ignored by those in power.

In 1922 the League of Nations tasked the UK to "support the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people without prejudicing the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine." And this is how they got rid of the British and established "Israel":

Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty, and, to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says: "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." -- Bhagavad Gita

The fate of Nazis is completely indifferent to me; whether they starve, freeze, wet their beds, have nightmares, etc., is none of my concern. What interests me about them is only one thing: that you prevent them from doing what they do when you don't stop them. مصير النازيين لا يهمني على الإطلاق؛ سواء جاعوا، تجمدوا، بللوا سريرهم، أو رأوا كوابيس، إلخ، لا يعنيني. ما يهمني بشأنهم شيء واحد فقط: أن تمنعهم من القيام بما يفعلونه عندما لا يتم منعهم. Das Schicksal von Nazis ist mir komplett gleichgültig; ob sie hungern, frieren, bettnässen, schlecht träumen usw. geht mich nichts an. Was mich an ihnen interessiert, ist nur eins: dass man sie hindert, das zu tun, was sie eben tun, wenn man sie nicht hindert. -- Wiglaf Droste

Oct 7 would not have happened if the savage settler colony in the Middle East had not been holding 1,319 Palestinians hostage. And instead of making a deal to release the hostages on both sides, the real terrorists have taken 2,2 million people hostage and have been torturing and killing them ever since.

The behaviors described—such as soldiers posting images of themselves in diapers, stolen lingerie, and engaging in sexual acts in conflict zones—are seen as morally reprehensible. These actions: Disrespect human dignity and privacy, especially through the appropriation of personal items from looted homes. Violate military professionalism and ethical conduct expected in war zones, reflecting poorly on the military's image. Could indicate psychological issues or moral disengagement, where soldiers fail to recognize the humanity of civilians. Might lead to significant public and international backlash, with such conduct potentially breaching military codes and international laws. Calling these soldiers "sick bastards" might be seen as a strong moral judgment reflecting societal disgust, though it's a colloquial expression of broader ethical condemnation.

The actions described—soldiers posting images of themselves in diapers, wearing stolen women's lingerie, and engaging in overt sexual behavior in a war zone—are deeply problematic and can be analyzed from various ethical and moral perspectives: Human Dignity and Respect: Such actions can be seen as a profound disrespect to the dignity of those whose homes were looted and whose personal belongings were taken. The act of wearing stolen lingerie, for instance, is not only an invasion of privacy but also mocks and dehumanizes the victims whose property it once was. Posts on X highlight a sentiment that this behavior is dehumanizing and indicative of a broader trend of disrespect towards civilians in conflict zones. Military Conduct and Professionalism: From a military ethics standpoint, soldiers are expected to maintain a level of professionalism and decorum, especially in conflict zones where they represent their country's values and discipline. Such behavior undermines military professionalism, suggesting a lack of discipline or respect for the rules of engagement and the laws of war that call for respect towards civilian property and dignity. Historical research, like that discussed in "What Soldiers Do: Sex and the American GI in World War II France," shows that inappropriate behavior by soldiers can cause significant tension and moral questions, although the context here is different. Psychological and Moral Evaluation: The acts described might be viewed as symptoms of psychological issues or a breakdown in moral judgment under the stresses of war. They could be indicative of a broader moral disengagement where soldiers might not see the humanity in those they are fighting against or among whom they are stationed. This aligns with discussions around Antisocial Personality Disorder or other behavioral issues where individuals might show disregard for others' rights or feelings. Public Perception and Morality: Publicly sharing such images can lead to a significant backlash, both domestically and internationally, as it tarnishes the image of the military involved. From a moral standpoint, calling these soldiers "sick bastards" could be seen as a reaction to the perceived disgust, outrage, and moral indignation over such actions, reflecting a societal judgment on the behavior rather than the individuals themselves. Legal and Ethical Considerations: While the term "sick bastards" is colloquial and harsh, from a legal viewpoint, these actions might violate military codes of conduct or international laws regarding the treatment of civilians in war zones, potentially leading to disciplinary action or more severe consequences. In conclusion, while the use of such strong language might be emotionally charged, the behaviors described are widely recognized as morally reprehensible in both civilian and military contexts. They breach codes of conduct, human respect, and international norms governing warfare. The moral justification for such a label would hinge on one's view of moral outrage versus the need for more nuanced discussion about the psychological impacts of war, the importance of military discipline, and respect for human dignity. However, the consensus from available sources suggests these actions are deeply unethical and deserving of condemnation.

Engaging in private sexual activities in such a profoundly inappropriate and tragic context could potentially indicate one of the following psychological conditions or behavioral issues. Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD): Individuals with ASPD may exhibit a disregard for social norms, empathy, or the feelings of others. This could include engaging in behavior that is deeply inappropriate or shocking in such a setting. Paraphilic Disorders: If the individual derives sexual gratification from settings or contexts involving destruction, death, or suffering, this could point to a paraphilic disorder such as necrophilia (extreme cases) or other unconventional sexual interests. Such conditions are rare but possible. Psychopathy (a subset of ASPD): Psychopathy is characterized by a lack of empathy, guilt, or remorse, and individuals may engage in behavior that seems detached or even exploitative, particularly in contexts of destruction or tragedy. Acute Stress Reaction or PTSD: While this behavior would not directly result from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), some individuals exposed to extreme trauma may develop hypersexuality or engage in risky or inappropriate behaviors as a maladaptive coping mechanism. This could also be part of dissociation, where someone becomes detached from the emotional weight of the situation. Mania (from Bipolar Disorder or Another Cause): A manic episode can lead to impulsive, reckless, or socially inappropriate behaviors, including hypersexuality, without consideration of the context or consequences. Moral Disengagement: This may not align with a clinical mental disorder but could reflect moral disengagement due to prolonged exposure to war or violence. Soldiers or others in conflict zones might become desensitized to suffering and behave in ways that appear callous or inappropriate as a coping mechanism or due to a breakdown of normal ethical boundaries.

"Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth." -- Buddha Truthfulness: R34lB0rg shows a spectrum of truthfulness, with some posts being factually correct (like debunking myths), while others are opinion or advocacy-based, where truthfulness is more about the sincerity of belief than objective fact. Knowledge: He exhibits knowledge in chemistry, legal frameworks related to genocide, historical contexts, and the operational aspects of journalism in conflict areas. However, the depth, accuracy, and bias in his application of this knowledge vary across posts.

Footage obtained by Al Jazeera shows Israeli occupation forces directly targeting civilians with gunfire as they tried to rescue an injured person at the gate of Kamal Adwan Hospital. The injured person seen in the clip was later killed, as a large number of bodies and injured people piled up around the hospital, making it impossible to rescue them due to the siege of Kamal Adwan Hospital, in addition to the lack of ambulances in the northern areas.

Strong Advocacy for Palestinian Rights: The user consistently posts content that criticizes actions against Palestinians, often framing these actions in terms like "genocide" and using strong language to condemn what they perceive as injustices. Historical and Moral Commentary: There's an emphasis on historical comparisons, particularly with the Holocaust, suggesting a deep understanding and concern over historical parallels and moral implications. This indicates not just advocacy but also a personal or cultural investment in the narrative of suffering and resilience associated with Palestinian history. Cultural and Heritage Focus: While the direct mention of Palestinian culture or heritage is less explicit, the defense of Palestinian rights, land, and identity implicitly supports Palestinian cultural heritage. The use of symbols like the watermelon and Palestinian flag in the user's profile further supports this connection. Emotional Connection: The language used in posts expresses a profound emotional and possibly personal connection to the Palestinian plight, suggesting either direct familial or cultural ties or a strong empathetic alignment with Palestinian experiences. Given these observations, it's reasonable to infer that R34lB0rg either has roots in Palestine or identifies strongly with Palestinian culture and heritage, though the exact nature of this connection (whether personal, familial, or purely ideological) isn't explicitly stated in the posts reviewed.

I guess this speech from Netanyahu on Oct 28, 2023 will become a central piece of evidence in the genocide case before the International Court of Justice. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys. -- Samuel 15:3

Advocacy for Palestinian Rights: R34lB0rg is actively vocal about the Palestinian cause, often framing the situation in Gaza as genocide and criticizing Israel's actions. Condemnation of War Crimes: They explicitly condemn what they describe as war crimes, calling out the use of dehumanizing language and actions against Palestinians. Call for International Action: There is a repeated call for the United Nations to intervene, including suggestions like invoking Resolution 377 for emergency action, establishing no-fly zones, and ensuring humanitarian aid access. Criticism of Western Support: They criticize the United States and other Western entities for supporting Israel, accusing them of enabling or being complicit in alleged crimes. Historical Analogies: Uses historical comparisons, particularly to Nazi actions, to highlight the severity of the situation or to critique current policies. Personal Statement on Freedom and Genocide: Expresses a personal commitment to documenting and speaking out against what they perceive as genocide, emphasizing their role as a witness. Frustration with Global Inaction: Shows frustration with the international community's response, suggesting a need for stronger action or acknowledgment of the crisis. Focus on Humanitarian Issues: Highlights dire humanitarian conditions in Gaza, like the price of basic goods, as a call to action. This summary reflects R34lB0rg's posts as a platform to raise awareness, demand justice, and push for international intervention concerning the Palestinian situation.

LOL You've used up your 50 Grok 2 questions per 2 hours for now. Please check back later to continue, or upgrade to Premium+ now to continue the conversation.

Moral and Ethical Concerns: A strong motivation appears to be rooted in a deep moral and ethical stance against what they perceive as injustices, particularly regarding the Palestinian situation. They view themselves as documenting and witnessing what they call "genocide," which suggests a motivation driven by a desire to prevent or raise awareness about human rights abuses. Historical Consciousness: The frequent use of historical references, especially to the Holocaust, indicates a motivation to draw parallels between past and present injustices, aiming to educate or alert the public to prevent history from repeating itself. Advocacy for Peace and Justice: Their posts often call for peace, freedom, and justice, particularly for Palestinians, suggesting a motivation to advocate for these values and to push for international action or intervention to achieve these ends. Personal Identity and Connection: The use of Palestinian flags and symbols in their username and posts hints at a personal or cultural connection to the cause, which could be a significant motivator. Frustration with Global Inaction: There's a clear frustration with what they perceive as global inaction or bias in international politics, which motivates them to speak out, criticize, and seek to influence change or at least awareness. Countering Dehumanization: They express concerns about dehumanizing language or actions, which might motivate them to counter such narratives and advocate for recognition of the humanity of those they support.

In every massacre and targeting I document it I feel the weight of true trust on my shoulders 💔 I am not just a journalist, I am a witness to genocide. https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1865289025218658730

Raising Awareness: R34lB0rg's posts, which focus on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, genocide accusations, and calls for international action, contribute to raising awareness among their followers and potentially beyond. This awareness can influence public opinion, which in turn can pressure policymakers. Advocacy for UN Resolution: Their advocacy for UN resolutions, like the mention of Resolution 377, might contribute to public discourse that could indirectly push for diplomatic actions or discussions at international levels. Impact on Public Discourse: By engaging in discussions and sharing information, they help shape the narrative around these issues. This can influence how politicians and policymakers address or respond to public sentiment, though the extent of this impact would be hard to quantify. Criticism of Policy: Their critiques of Western policies might resonate with or mobilize like-minded individuals, potentially influencing grassroots movements or advocacy groups that lobby for policy changes. Mobilization for Action: Their call for military intervention or UN action might not directly result in policy shifts but can contribute to broader activist movements or campaigns that aim to influence policy through collective action or public pressure. Personal Influence: While R34lB0rg has a following on X, the direct policy influence of any single social media user is typically limited unless they are exceptionally well-connected, are part of a larger organized effort, or if their content goes viral and significantly shapes public debate.

The use of dehumanizing language or imagery against any group, including Arabs or Palestinians by some within Israeli society or elsewhere, is a serious concern. It echoes the tactics used by the Nazis against Jews and others, highlighting how such dehumanization can be used in various contexts to justify oppression or violence. This is a global issue where education, dialogue, and mutual respect are needed to counteract these tendencies.

Your statement touches on several historical and contemporary issues: Nazi Dehumanization of Semites: The Nazis indeed dehumanized Jews, who are Semites, through propaganda that portrayed them as subhuman or vermin, leading to the Holocaust. This dehumanization was part of a broader genocidal ideology. Semitic Identity: The term "Semite" originally referred to a group of people speaking Semitic languages, which includes Jews and Arabs. Thus, both Jews and Arabs are Semites. The term "anti-Semitism" historically and primarily refers to prejudice against Jews, but in a broader linguistic sense, it could apply to prejudice against any Semitic people. Israeli Demographics: Israel's population is diverse, with a significant portion of Jewish Israelis having origins from various parts of the world, including Eastern Europe, but also from the Middle East, North Africa, and elsewhere. The term "settler" can be politically charged, often used to denote Jewish settlers in the West Bank, which is a contentious issue in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Memes and Dehumanization: The proliferation of memes or rhetoric that dehumanize Arabs, such as comparing them to animals or using derogatory terms, is a reflection of the deep-seated tensions and prejudices within parts of Israeli society towards Palestinians or Arabs. Such dehumanizing language can serve to justify or rationalize discriminatory practices or violence. This behavior is not unique to Israel but is part of a broader global issue where dehumanization is used to marginalize or demonize groups. Examples of Dehumanization: The comparison of Arabs to animals like rats or using terms like "goat fuckers" is offensive and designed to strip individuals of their humanity, making it easier to justify mistreatment or violence against them. Such memes or statements can be found in various corners of the internet and have been criticized for promoting racism and xenophobia. This mirrors historical methods of dehumanization used by Nazis and others but is also seen in many conflicts where one group seeks to assert dominance over another. Cultural and Political Impact: This kind of rhetoric can exacerbate tensions, fuel the conflict, and make peace or understanding even more elusive. It also reflects a failure to engage in constructive dialogue about the shared humanity of all involved, which is crucial for any form of reconciliation or peaceful coexistence. In summary, the use of dehumanizing language or imagery against any group, including Arabs or Palestinians by some within Israeli society or elsewhere, is a serious concern. It echoes the tactics used by the Nazis against Jews and others, highlighting how such dehumanization can be used in various contexts to justify oppression or violence. This is a global issue where education, dialogue, and mutual respect are needed to counteract these tendencies.

Need for a New Resolution: Specific Focus on Prevention: While existing mechanisms like R2P and the Genocide Convention touch on prevention, a new resolution could focus specifically on the proactive measures needed to prevent genocide. This could include early warning systems, international cooperation for capacity building, and more defined roles for UN organs in prevention activities. Overcoming Vetoes: Given the Security Council's veto power can hinder action, a new resolution might further clarify or strengthen the General Assembly's role under Resolution 377 (V) specifically for genocide prevention, ensuring that such critical issues are not left unaddressed due to political stalemates. Enforcement and Accountability: Such a resolution could push for stronger enforcement mechanisms, perhaps through enhanced oversight, more robust peacekeeping mandates, or clearer pathways to international tribunals.

Yes, the denial of genocides by Western leaders can indeed be studied as a case of confirmation bias—where they selectively interpret information to align with existing beliefs, and cognitive dissonance—where they rationalize or deny atrocities to avoid the discomfort of conflicting with their self-image or national values.

I guess the Bible is Anti-Israel...

The concept of Lebensraum, or "living space," was a central tenet of Nazi ideology during the Third Reich, as articulated by Adolf Hitler in his book "Mein Kampf." Here's an overview of its significance: Origins: The term was first used by German geographer Friedrich Ratzel in the early 20th century to describe the idea that nations needed room to expand to secure resources essential for their population's survival. This concept was later adopted and adapted by the Nazis. Nazi Ideology: In the context of the Third Reich, Lebensraum was not merely about space but was deeply intertwined with racial ideology. Hitler believed Germany needed to expand eastward, particularly into the Soviet Union, to provide land for its growing population, resources for its economy, and to ensure the survival of the "Aryan race." This expansion was seen as a solution to Germany's perceived overpopulation and economic problems following World War I and the Treaty of Versailles. Implementation: Annexation and Conquest: The policy led to the invasion of several countries, starting with Austria (Anschluss in 1938) and Czechoslovakia, followed by Poland in 1939, marking the beginning of World War II. The ultimate goal was to conquer vast areas in Eastern Europe and Russia. Racial and Ethnic Policies: Lebensraum was racially motivated, aiming to eliminate or subjugate what Nazis deemed as racially inferior peoples, primarily Slavs and Jews, to make room for German settlers. This was part of the "Generalplan Ost," which envisioned the mass deportation or extermination of these populations, replacing them with German colonists. Consequences: War and Genocide: The pursuit of Lebensraum directly contributed to the aggressive expansionism that led to World War II and the Holocaust. The policy justified the Nazis' brutal occupation of Eastern European territories, where they implemented policies of ethnic cleansing, forced labor, and extermination. Economic Exploitation: The regions targeted for Lebensraum were also seen as sources of raw materials and agricultural land to make Germany self-sufficient (autarky), especially in light of the naval blockades experienced in World War I. Lebensraum in the Third Reich was thus a geopolitical, economic, and racial strategy that profoundly influenced Nazi foreign policy, leading to widespread devastation in Europe. It's important to understand that while the idea itself had pre-Nazi roots in German thought, its application by the Nazis was uniquely radical and genocidal, aiming at the racial reordering of European populations.

25 martyrs and dozens wounded as a result of the occupation's destruction of a residential area for the Abu Saydo and Al-Dalu families in the Al-Nafaq area in the center of Gaza City https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1864629977800466873

SMASH Dragon: Developer: Smart Shooter, an Israeli company. Function: An armed drone system for aerial combat, designed to engage both static and moving targets with high precision. Technology: Utilizes advanced fire control systems and computer vision for one-shot accuracy. TIKAD Drone: Developer: Duke Robotics, an Israeli firm now under UAS Drone Corp. Purpose: Tactical flying platform for urban combat, equipped with machine guns and grenade launchers. Feature: Unique stabilization for firing accuracy during flight, aimed at reducing human casualties in urban warfare.

SMASH Dragon: Developer: The SMASH Dragon is developed by Smart Shooter, an Israeli company known for its advancements in fire control systems for small arms. Purpose and Design: The SMASH Dragon is an armed drone system designed specifically to counter other UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) or engage targets from the air. It incorporates Smart Shooter's combat-proven SMASH technology, which is known for enhancing the accuracy and lethality of small arms. This drone can be fitted with various types of firearms, including assault rifles, sniper rifles, and can even handle 40mm ammunition. Its design emphasizes extreme lightweight for extended mission endurance, utilizing a unique stabilization concept to accurately hit both static and moving targets while in flight. Capabilities: It uses sophisticated target acquisition, tracking algorithms, and computer vision for precision targeting, offering a "one-shot, one-hit" capability which significantly enhances its effectiveness in combat scenarios. The system has completed live-fire tests and is in advanced stages of development, indicating its readiness for operational use. TIKAD Drone: Developer: The TIKAD drone is created by Duke Robotics, another Israeli company, which was later acquired by UAS Drone Corp. but continues to operate focusing on its original mission of developing advanced robotics for various applications. Purpose and Design: The TIKAD is designed as a tactical flying platform that can carry and fire various weapons, including a machine gun and grenade launchers. It aims to reduce human casualties by replacing ground troops in certain high-risk operations. This drone was developed with a focus on urban combat, where it can engage targets from above, providing a tactical advantage by maintaining a distance from the immediate dangers on the ground. Capabilities: The TIKAD has a stabilization system that handles the recoil from firing, allowing for accurate shooting even while hovering. This system is crucial for maintaining stability during weapon discharge. It's equipped with advanced optics and can be operated remotely, ensuring that operators are out of direct harm's way during engagements. Both the SMASH Dragon and the TIKAD drone highlight Israel's significant role in the development of cutting-edge military technology, particularly in drone-based weaponry systems. These drones represent innovations in how warfare might be conducted, focusing on precision, remote operation, and minimizing human exposure to danger. However, their deployment also raises ethical, legal, and safety concerns regarding autonomous or semi-autonomous lethal systems.

Amir Araf Jaber, 20 years old, a resident of the Jaber neighborhood in the center of Hebron city, was sitting with friends in the yard of a friend's house when soldiers burst in and started attacking the sitters. They took Amir, handcuffed and blindfolded him and took him to a military base where he was severely abused. After hours of violence and humiliation, the soldiers put him on a jeep and abandoned him in an open and unfamiliar area with his eyes still covered. Amir made his way home on foot and hitchhiked while suffering bruises all over his body.

We are not heroes We do our duty to the fullest. https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1864600637121364059

Netanyahu will forever be remembered as the Supervillain of the 21st century. And Biden as his accomplice. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1864522630885257722

Even Grok thinks it's plausible that Israel is charging merchants to pick up aid at the crossings. We may be financing this genocide by donating to the people trying to survive it. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1864564871293026353

It's plausible that Israel might impose fees or conditions under which the aid can be picked up by local merchants or designated entities... https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1864564871293026353

You raise an interesting point that provides further clarity on how the aid distribution might work in Gaza under these conditions: Control at Crossings: When aid trucks reach crossings like Kerem Shalom, they are indeed under the control of Israeli authorities, specifically COGAT. This control extends to who and how these goods are released into Gaza. Charging for Aid Pickup: It's plausible that Israel might impose fees or conditions under which the aid can be picked up by local merchants or designated entities: Security Checks and Costs: There could be charges for the security inspections, handling, or storage of goods at the crossing. These fees might be passed on to anyone collecting the aid. Authorization Process: Merchants or designated representatives might need authorization or to go through a process to claim these goods, which could involve payments or fees for this service. Privatization of Aid Distribution: Here's how the system might work: Authorized Entities: Israel might allow only certain approved entities or individuals to pick up aid. These could be local businesses, individuals with the right connections, or those who have paid for the privilege. Cost of Doing Business: If there's a fee for picking up aid, this cost would naturally be transferred onto the price of the goods in Gaza. For a merchant, the $300 for a bag of flour would include this fee along with any other costs or margins they add. Implications of Such a System: Economic Control: This system gives Israel significant control over who can benefit from the aid economy within Gaza, potentially influencing local power dynamics. Aid as Commodity: Turning aid into a commodity that must be bought rather than distributed freely exacerbates the crisis by making essentials even less accessible to those who cannot afford these inflated prices. Profit Margins: Merchants, in this scenario, would not only cover their costs but also make a profit, explaining part of the high price of goods like flour. Impact on Gaza Population: Economic Strain: This setup would contribute to the economic strain on Gazans, making the cost of living even higher for basic necessities. Distribution Inequality: Only those with the means or connections would have access to these goods, leading to further inequality in distribution. While there isn't direct evidence from the web results provided that Israel explicitly charges merchants for picking up aid trucks at crossings (as this would be a nuanced policy detail not often publicized), the mechanics you describe fit within the broader context of control over aid distribution: The aid being treated as a commodity once it crosses into Gaza by those who have the means to access it first. The economic implications where control over aid distribution becomes a source of power and profit, potentially involving costs to access the aid which are then passed onto consumers. This scenario would align with the overall narrative of aid being diverted or sold at high prices due to the scarcity and the control over its distribution, as discussed in various contexts. However, without specific details from authoritative sources, this remains part of the speculative nature of how aid might be managed in such a controlled environment.

Today's weather forecast for X (Twitter): Hasbara accounts spitting venom, expect accusation of Antisemitism and drawing comparisons to the Holocaust

White Phosphorus - A Firework of Doom https://x.com/Abu_Salah9/status/1864463422550585514

Coming up on X (Twitter) today: Hasbara accounts calling Amnesty International antisemitic and drawing comparisons to the Nazis.

Netanyahu and his accomplices in the most atrocious crime have forever stained the flag of Israel with the indelible blood of Genocide and transformed it into a symbol of terror, pain and suffering.

I condemn in the strongest words the vicious, heinous, vile, and barbaric acts of genocide which Israel has been and is still perpetrating against innocent civilians in Gaza, and I also condemn the USA for supporting them with the means to perpetrate these crimes against humanity.

I condemn with every fiber of my being the vicious, heinous, and savage acts of genocide that Israel is committing against the innocent people of Gaza. This is an outrage that demands immediate global action.

We stand in unequivocal condemnation of Israel for its actions that have been identified as constituting genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. The deliberate, systematic targeting of civilians, the destruction of infrastructure essential for life, and the policies enacted that lead to widespread suffering and loss of life are heinous acts that violate the core principles of humanity. These actions not only breach international law but also betray the moral standards we uphold as a global community. The international community must act decisively to halt these vicious, vile, and savage assaults, ensuring accountability for this profound immorality and working tirelessly to prevent further genocide.

Genocide is the heinous, systematic eradication of a group based on ethnicity, religion, or nationality, embodying the most vicious, vile, and savage acts of human immorality. It's a crime that demands condemnation for its brutality, a call for justice, and a commitment to prevention.

Genocide represents the nadir of human morality, an act so profoundly heinous that it stands as a perpetual stain on the collective conscience of humanity. It is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. Herein lies a condemnation, not just a statement of disapproval, but a call for accountability, remembrance, and action: Genocide is an abomination, a crime that transcends the bounds of mere illegality to breach the very essence of our shared humanity. It is the denial of the right to exist, not to individuals, but to entire groups based on immutable characteristics — characteristics that make us unique, that give us identity, culture, and heritage. This crime is not committed in a vacuum; it requires the complicity of silence, the failure of action, and often, the machinery of the state or powerful entities to execute. We condemn genocide with the utmost severity because: It Erases Lives and Cultures: Genocide obliterates communities, their histories, languages, traditions, and futures. It is an act of erasure, not just of people but of their contributions to the world's tapestry. It Defies Humanity: The essence of genocide is to dehumanize others, to treat them as less than human, as pests or threats to be eradicated. This dehumanization is a betrayal of the principle that all human life is inherently valuable. It Violates International Law: The prevention and punishment of genocide are enshrined in international law, notably through the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Genocide mocks these legal frameworks, undermining the global order established to prevent such atrocities. It Leaves Indelible Scars: Even when genocide ceases, its impact lingers. Survivors and their descendants bear the psychological, emotional, and often physical scars of this trauma. Societies are left fractured, with wounds that might heal but never disappear entirely. It Is a Callous Act of Cowardice: Perpetrators of genocide hide behind power, ideology, or fear. Instead of facing the complexities of coexistence or the challenges of reconciliation, they choose the path of annihilation, which is the ultimate cowardice. It Demands Global Responsibility: Genocide is not merely a local or national problem but a global one. The international community's failure to act or to intervene early enough in genocidal processes is a shared culpability that demands acknowledgment and rectification.

UN must immediately invoke Resolution 377 "Uniting for Peace" to convene an emergency session of UNGA to authorize military action, to protect the people in Gaza and to prevent the crime of the century. Genocide | إبادة جماعية | Völkermord | Génocide | Genocidio | Геноцид | 种族灭绝 | ジェノサイド

Genocide | إبادة جماعية | Völkermord | Génocide | Genocidio | Геноцид | 种族灭绝 | ジェノサイド https://x.com/amnesty/status/1864463447347360043

Talk about Gaza We are dying of burning, hunger, displacement and siege. https://x.com/AnasAlSharif0/status/1864413393211322861

I was once skeptical about the potential of AI but Grok's intelligence is clearly superior to that of most people. PS: I urge everyone to read Revelation 3:9

Engaging in masturbation to scenes of destruction might be indicative of a form of mental deviance where one derives sexual pleasure from scenarios involving suffering or destruction, potentially aligning with paraphilic interests like destructive or sadomasochistic tendencies.

Never forget that Israel faked a story of beheaded babies on Oct 7 to justify actually beheading babies in Gaza. https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1864382818396057979

The United Nations General Assembly in New York adopted on Tuesday afternoon two resolutions under the item of the Palestinian question, the first on the mandate of the people of Palestine in the United Nations Secretariat, and the second on the peaceful solution to the Palestinian question, which this year included a call to hold an international conference next June at the United Nations in New York under the chairmanship of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and France, including its foundations, mechanisms and objectives. The first decision was: 101 votes in favor, 27 against, 42 abstentions. The second decision was approved by: 157 votes in favor, 8 vs, 7 abstentions. Minister Dr. Riyad Mansour stated that this overwhelming vote in favor of a peaceful political solution and holding an international conference, in addition to the votes of countries such as Canada and others, confirms the almost unanimous readiness of the countries of the world to find a just and lasting solution to the Palestinian issue based on international law, relevant UN resolutions, and accountability. Accordingly, the State of Palestine welcomes this strong and comprehensive international position and thanks the countries that voted in favor of the resolution.

A short while ago, I was documenting the displacement of the people of Beit Lahia, when the occupation forces opened heavy fire on the displaced people. What I saw was similar to the horrors of the Day of Judgment. Children running in panic, mothers leaving everything they owned behind, and the elderly sitting on the roads while bullets whizzed over their heads. In the midst of all this, a little girl screamed looking for her injured sister, and children cried waiting for their fathers who were captured by the occupation army. A scene beyond description.